Dialogue with Richard Dawkins, Rowan Williams and Anthony Kenny

Cargando...

<div class="yt-alert yt-alert-default yt-alert-error yt-alert-player"><div class="yt-alert-icon"><img src="//s.ytimg.com/yt/img/pixel-vfl3z5WfW.gif" class="icon master-sprite" alt="Icono de alerta"></div><div class="yt-alert-content"> <span class="yt-alert-vertical-trick"></span> <div class="yt-alert-message"> Es necesario disponer de Adobe Flash Player para ver este vídeo. <br> <a href="http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/">Descárgalo en la página de Adobe</a>. </div> </div></div>

11440

Cargando...

Para utilizar listas de reproducción, debes registrarte para obtener un nombre de usuario y un canal.

Subido por lambethpress el 28/02/2012

Sir Anthony Kenny chaired a dialogue at Oxford University between Archbishop Rowan Williams and Professor Richard Dawkins on the subject of "The nature of human beings and the question of their ultimate origin". The event was held on Thursday 23rd February 2012 in the Sheldonian Theatre, and was hosted by Sophia Europa (Theology Faculty) Oxford.

Categoría:

ONG y activismo

Licencia:

Licencia de YouTube estándar

Me gusta: 106 No me gusta: 0
Como se ve en: My Telegraph

Mejores comentarios

"I think that should keep us going..."

Brilliant, I've been looking forward to this :)

Thanks for the upload!

Monovlogue hace 1 mes 6
Dawkins could do with reading Aristotle who made the distinction between animate and inanimate matter as the problematic of philosophy. Aristotle wrote the 'Physics' as an explanation of inanimate matter and the 'Metaphysics' as an attempt to explain the question 'what is life?' To apply physics to life, whilst tempting, leaves few solutions to the problems of Life and Being.

strav12 hace 2 semanas 4

Ver todos

Todos los comentarios (10)

Añade un canal ahora para publicar un comentario.

That what makes Britain unique and adorable! Two clashing points of views, in a civil manner, express ideas and generate light. Thanks for the post

AbuSaif1981 hace 2 semanas 4
God bless Richard Dawkins also :)

brendos444 en respuesta a BronyEditor (Mostrar el comentario) hace 2 semanas
Two really nice guys! It's nice to see a complete absence of hostility. :)

Zech084632 hace 3 semanas 4
Rather disappointed that anthony kenny didn't/doesn't understand the anthropic principle (in its plantery sense)- you wonder how he can have thought about such things and not come into contact with it. It's not that the gunmen missed because we're alive, it's that there were millions of different executions going on and since we're alive, we must be the one where the gunmen missed- very simple concept.

GodTheHypothesis hace 3 semanas
And Richard Dawkins :)

raggyelf en respuesta a BronyEditor (Mostrar el comentario) hace 3 semanas en la lista de reproducción Favorite videos 2
God bless Sir Anthony Kenny and Archbishop Rowan Williams! :)

BronyEditor hace 3 semanas 3
If one could attach sophisticated telemetry to the human cell through fertilisation to the birth of the human being, and one could do the same with a chimpanzee, say, and a water buffalo, what differences in principle would we see on the telemetry screens as gestation progressed? It seems to me that the chemical processes and electrical bonding would more or less be the application of the same processes according to the same physical laws. What, then, does it mean to be human?

PaulP567 hace 3 semanas
Determinism doesn't imply predictability, even with complete information. Dennett should have been teaching his friend quite a little bit better.

Haarez1 hace 3 semanas